Argumentation 30 (2):181-205 (2016)

To complement theoretically driven work on argument, we present a datadriven description of published, written argument. We analyze political or philosophical treatises, articles in scholarly journals, and U.S. Supreme Court decisions. The description has emerged out of an inductive and a posteriori process based in grounded theory. The result is a suite of thirty-eight features that begins with conditions antecedent to writing and continues through to the consequences for the reader. We relate observational data to theories and practices from the fields of rhetoric and applied linguistics, including pragmatics, to explain how the features work together as social and communicative acts in which the writer produces a text in order to affect or change the beliefs or actions of the reader. For our purposes, the whole text is the argument and is not reduced to its propositional content; it is a unified communicative act. In our description of argument, the writer, reader, and text are central categories. We describe these categories and their features using examples from a variety of types of written argument.
Keywords Argument  Rhetoric  Applied linguistics  Speech acts  Writing studies
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-015-9366-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,657
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Rogers Searle - 1969 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.William P. Alston - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (79):172-179.
Literature as Exploration.Walter H. Clark & Louise M. Rosenblatt - 1970 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 4 (2):150.
The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work.John Reichert - 1979 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (1):91-93.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Farewell to the Luck (and Mind) Argument.Christopher Evan Franklin - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (2):199-230.
Area Bombing in World War II: The Argument of Michael Walzer.Stephen E. Lammers - 1983 - Journal of Religious Ethics 11 (1):96 - 113.
Was Kant a Virtue Ethicist?Robert N. Johnson - 2008 - In Monika Betzler (ed.), Kant's Ethics of Virtues. De Gruyter. pp. 61-76.
Making Up Your Mind.Robert Mutti - 2002 - Broadview Press.
Scepticism and the Interpreter.Damian Cox - 2000 - Philosophical Papers 29 (2):61-72.
Goedel's Ontological Argument.Randolph Rubens Goldman - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.


Added to PP index

Total views
32 ( #345,901 of 2,462,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,321 of 2,462,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes