Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):423-427 (2012)

Abstract
Determining whether a research risk meets or exceeds a regulatory standard of risk acceptability is difficult. Recently a framework called the systematic evaluation of research risks (SERR) has been proposed as a method of comparing research risks with predetermined standards of acceptability. SERR purports to offer a systematic and largely determinate (definite) way to compare risks and say whether a specific research risk falls below or above an acknowledged standard of acceptable risk. Here the authors review some philosophical problems with this framework, which they take to be representative of determinate approaches to risk comparison, and conclude that it should not be used in a stand-alone or determinate fashion. Instead, the authors suggest that a deliberative approach may be a more viable candidate for future development. Such an approach could be informed by methods such as SERR without being rigidly bound to them
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2011-100194
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.
Valuing Risk: The Ethical Review of Clinical Trial Safety.Jonathan Kimmelman - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):369-393.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Risk Standards for Pediatric Research: Rethinking The.David Wendler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):187-198.
Group Risks, Risks to Groups, and Group Engagement in Genetics Research.Daniel M. Hausman - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):351-369.
Valuing Risk: The Ethical Review of Clinical Trial Safety.Jonathan Kimmelman - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):369-393.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-02-26

Total views
130 ( #89,943 of 2,507,018 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,018 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes