Justification and the Uniqueness Thesis Again - A Reply to Anantharaman

Logos and Episteme 7 (1):95-100 (2016)
Luis Rosa
University of Cologne
I reinforce my defense of permissivism about the rationality of doxastic attitudes in the face of a certain body of evidence against criticism published in this journal by Anantharaman. After making some conceptual clarifications, I manage to show that at least one of my original arguments pro-permissivism is left unscathed by Anantharaman's points.
Keywords Uniqueness thesis  Justification  Permissiveness
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
54 ( #120,587 of 2,293,920 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #29,139 of 2,293,920 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature