Kant on Construction, Apriority, and the Moral Relevance of Universalization

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1143 - 1174 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper introduces a referential reading of Kant?s practical project, according to which maxims are made morally permissible by their correspondence to objects, though not the ontic objects of Kant?s theoretical project but deontic objects (what ought to be). It illustrates this model by showing how the content of the Formula of Universal Law might be determined by what our capacity of practical reason can stand in a referential relation to, rather than by facts about what kind of beings we are (viz., uncaused causes). This solves the neglected puzzle of why there are passages in Kant?s works suggesting robust analogies between mathematics and ethics, since to universalize a maxim is to test a priori whether a practical object with that particular content can be constructed. An apparent problem with this hypothesis is that the medium of practical sensibility (feeling) does not play a role analogous to the medium of theoretical sensibility (intuition). In response I distinguish two separate Kantian accounts of mathematical apriority. The thesis that maxim universalization is a species of construction, and thus a priori, turns out to be consistent with the account of apriority that informs Kant?s understanding of actual mathematical practice



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Practical Reason: Categorical Imperative, Maxims, Laws.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2010 - In W. Dudley & K. Engelhard (eds.), Kant: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing.
Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason.Patrick Kain - 2010 - In Benjamin Lipscomb & James Krueger (eds.), Kant's Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality. de Gruyter. pp. 211--230.
The Apriority of the Starting‐Point of Kant's Transcendental Epistemology.Vasilis Politis - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):255 – 284.
Kant, Skepticism, and Moral Sensibility.Owen Ware - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Toronto
Kant’s Culture of Humiliation: Politics and Ethical Cultivation.Paul Saurette - 2002 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (1):59-90.
Kant, Hegel, and Determining Our Duties.Kenneth Westphal - 2005 - Jahrbuch für Recht and Ethik/Annual Review of Law & Ethics 13:335-354.
Hegel on Space: A Critique of Kant's Transcendental Philosophy.Scott Jenkins - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (4):326-355.
Maxims in Kant's Practical Philosophy.Richard R. McCarty - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):65-83.
Concerning Moral Faith in Kant.Edgard José Jorge Filho - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:167-175.


Added to PP

66 (#179,095)

6 months
3 (#209,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Rosenkoetter
Dartmouth College

Citations of this work

The Bloomsbury Companion to Kant.Dennis Schulting (ed.) - 2015 - Bloomsbury Academic.
Applied Ethics - Perspectives From Romania.Shunzo Majima & Valentin Muresan (eds.) - 2013 - Center for Applied Ethics and Philosophy, Hokkaido University.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Creating the Kingdom of Ends.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant’s Ethical Thought.Allen W. Wood - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant’s Ethical Thought. [REVIEW]Allen W. Wood - 1999 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (4):758-759.

View all 24 references / Add more references