“Local determination”, even if we could find it, does not challenge free will: Commentary on Marcelo Fischborn

Philosophical Psychology 30 (1-2):185-197 (2017)
Abstract
Marcelo Fischborn discusses the significance of neuroscience for debates about free will. Although he concedes that, to date, Libet-style experiments have failed to threaten “libertarian free will”, he argues that, in principle, neuroscience and psychology could do so by supporting local determinism. We argue that, in principle, Libet-style experiments cannot succeed in disproving or even establishing serious doubt about libertarian free will. First, we contend that “local determination”, as Fischborn outlines it, is not a coherent concept. Moreover, determinism is unlikely to be established by neuroscience in any form that should trouble compatibilists or libertarians—that is, anyone who thinks we might have free will. We conclude that, in principle, neuroscience will not be able undermine libertarian free will and explain why these conclusions support a coherent compatibilist notion of causal sourcehood.
Keywords free will  determinism  compatibilism  neuroscience
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2016.1248286
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Does Free Will Exist?David Kyle Johnson - 2016 - Think 15 (42):53-70.
Psychology and Free Will: A Commentary.Alfred Mele - 2008 - In J. Baer, J. C. Kaufman & R. Baumeister (eds.), Are We Free? Psychology and Free Will. Oxford University Press. pp. 325.
Free Will and the Unconscious Precursors of Choice.Markus E. Schlosser - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):365-384.
The Two-Stage Solution to the Problem of Free Will.Robert O. Doyle - 2013 - In Antoine Suarez Peter Adams (ed.), Is Science Compatible with Free Will? Springer. pp. 235-254.
The Explanatory Power of Local Miracle Compatibilism.Garrett Pendergraft - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 156 (2):249-266.
A Reason To Be Free.Giulio Mecacci & Pim Haselager - 2015 - Neuroethics 8 (3):327-334.
The Impact Of Neuroscience On The Free Will Debate.Stephen Morris - 2009 - Florida Philosophical Review 9 (2):56-78.
Brain Determinism and Free Will.Sergio Magni - 2009 - Etica E Politica 11 (2):57-67.
The Phenomenology of Free Will.Eddy Nahmias, Stephen G. Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer & Jason Turner - 2004 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (7-8):162-179.
Added to PP index
2016-11-15

Total downloads
121 ( #41,082 of 2,180,171 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #5,019 of 2,180,171 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums