Book Review: Moral appraisability: Puzzles, proposals and perplexities [Book Review]

Philosophical Review 109 (1):132-135 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral Appraisability is not quite such a good book as its confident and lucid introduction leads one to hope, but it is work of both substance and promise. Ishtiyaque Haji’s main project is to determine sufficient conditions for moral appraisability: that is, for the propriety of holding an agent praiseworthy or blameworthy for an action. Identifying three primary conditions—control, autonomy, and epistemic—he refines them with the aid of a meticulous analysis of recent discussions and a range of vivid examples, and applies them in his closing chapters to such vexed questions as the responsibility of addicts for their addictive behavior, the justification of cross-cultural attributions of blame, and our appraisability for our thoughts when dreaming.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,244

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
72 (#238,640)

6 months
25 (#148,959)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Rosebury
University of Central Lancashire

Citations of this work

I Ought, Therefore I Can.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (2):167-216.
Is Blameworthiness Forever?Andrew C. Khoury & Benjamin Matheson - 2018 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4 (2):204-224.
Praise.Daniel Telech - 2022 - Philosophy Compass 17 (10):1-19.

View all 90 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references