Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):361-376 (2011)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The purely retributive moral justification of punishment has a gap at its centre. It fails to explain why the offender should not be protected from punishment by the intuitively powerful moral idea that afflicting another person (other than to avoid a greater harm) is always wrong. Attempts to close the gap have taken several different forms, and only one is discussed in this paper. This is the attempt to push aside the ‘protecting’ intuition, using some more powerful intuition specially invoked by the situations to which criminal justice is addressed. In one aspect of his complex defence of pure retributivism, Michael S. Moore attempts to show that the emotions of well-adjusted persons provide evidence of moral facts which justify the affliction of culpable wrongdoers in retribution for their wrongdoing. In particular, he appeals to the evidential significance of emotions aroused by especially heinous crimes, including the punishment-seeking guilt of the offender who truly confronts the reality of his immoral act. The paper argues that Moore fails to vindicate this appeal to moral realism, and thus to show that intrinsic personal moral desert (as distinct from ‘desert’ in a more restricted sense, relative to morally justified institutions) is a necessary and sufficient basis for punishment. Other theories of the role of emotions in morality are as defensible as Moore’s, while the compelling emotions to which he appeals to clinch his argument can be convincingly situated within a non-retributivist framework, especially when the distinction between the intuitions of the lawless world, and those of the world of law, is recognised. -/- .
|
Keywords | justification of punishment retributive theory moral significance of emotions desert resentment guilt moral realism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s11572-011-9117-x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 19 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Harm and Wrongdoing in Criminalisation Theory.Andreas von Hirsch - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):245-256.
Similar books and articles
The Two Faces of Revenge: Moral Responsibility and the Culture of Honor.Tamler Sommers - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (1):35-50.
A Retributive Argument Against Punishment.Greg Roebuck & David Wood - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
The Retributive Emotions: Passions and Pains of Punishment.Jules Holroyd - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (3):343-371.
Reciprocity as a Justification for Retributivism.Jami L. Anderson - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (1):13-25.
Persons, Punishment, and Free Will Skepticism.Benjamin Vilhauer - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):143-163.
Adam Smith and the Theory of Punishment.Richard Stalley - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (1):69-89.
Censure Theory and Intuitions About Punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):491-512.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-04-01
Total views
84 ( #138,277 of 2,505,154 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,154 )
2011-04-01
Total views
84 ( #138,277 of 2,505,154 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,154 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads