More Than Provocative, Less Than Scientific: A Commentary on the Editorial Decision to Publish Cofnas (2020)

Abstract

We are addressing this letter to the editors of Philosophical Psychology after reading an article they decided to publish in the recent vol. 33, issue 1. The article is by Nathan Cofnas and is entitled “Research on group differences in intelligence: A defense of free inquiry” (2020). The purpose of our letter is not to invite Cofnas’s contribution into a broader dialogue, but to respectfully voice our concerns about the decision to publish the manuscript, which, in our opinion, fails to meet a range of academic quality standards usually expected of academic publications.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Dual Use Research: Investigation Across Multiple Science Disciplines.Shannon Oltmann - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):327-341.
The Idea of a Scientific Concept of Race.Michael O. Hardimon - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37:249-282.
Own-Race-Absent Racism.T. Martin - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):25-33.
Publish or Perish.Benjamin Davies & Giulia Felappi - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (5):745-761.
Juan Cruz Cruz: "Hombre E historia en Vico". [REVIEW]Gemma Muñoz-Alonso López - 1983 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 3:297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-15

Downloads
2,855 (#1,463)

6 months
111 (#5,984)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Rasmus Rosenberg Larsen
University of Toronto at Mississauga
Helen De Cruz
Saint Louis University
Jonathan Kaplan
Oregon State University
4 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references