Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425 (2003)
Lehar argues that a simple Neuron Doctrine cannot explain perceptual phenomena such as size constancy but he fails to discuss existing, more complex neurological models. Size models that rely purely on scaling for distance are sparse, but several models are also concerned with other aspects of size perception such as geometrical illusions, relative size, adaptation, perceptual learning, and size discrimination.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On the Size of Refutation Kripke Models for Some Linear Modal and Tense Logics.Hiroakira Ono & Akira Nakamura - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (4):325 - 333.
Scaling Patterns of Interhemispheric Connectivity in Eutherian Mammals.Emmanuel Gilissen - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):16-17.
ZF + "Every Set is the Same Size as a Wellfounded Set".Thomas Forster - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (1):1-4.
To Normalize or Not to Normalize for Overall Size?Francisco Aboitiz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):327-328.
When the Coefficient Hits the Clinic: Effect Size and the Size of the Effect.Brendan Maher - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):211-211.
Environmental Ethics and Size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
Berkeley, Helmholtz, the Moon Illusion, and Two Visual Systems.Helen E. Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):116-117.
Lower Bounds to the Size of Constant-Depth Propositional Proofs.Jan Krajiček - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (1):73-86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #509,252 of 2,146,892 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,910 of 2,146,892 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.