Neurological models of size scaling

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425 (2003)
Lehar argues that a simple Neuron Doctrine cannot explain perceptual phenomena such as size constancy but he fails to discuss existing, more complex neurological models. Size models that rely purely on scaling for distance are sparse, but several models are also concerned with other aspects of size perception such as geometrical illusions, relative size, adaptation, perceptual learning, and size discrimination.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X03390090
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,621
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
ZF + "Every Set is the Same Size as a Wellfounded Set".Thomas Forster - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (1):1-4.
To Normalize or Not to Normalize for Overall Size?Francisco Aboitiz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):327-328.
Environmental Ethics and Size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
Perception of Size.Aage Slomann - 1968 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):101 – 113.
Berkeley, Helmholtz, the Moon Illusion, and Two Visual Systems.Helen E. Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):116-117.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

7 ( #523,504 of 2,169,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #82,344 of 2,169,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums