Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425 (2003)

Abstract
Lehar argues that a simple Neuron Doctrine cannot explain perceptual phenomena such as size constancy but he fails to discuss existing, more complex neurological models. Size models that rely purely on scaling for distance are sparse, but several models are also concerned with other aspects of size perception such as geometrical illusions, relative size, adaptation, perceptual learning, and size discrimination.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x03390090
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Berkeley, Helmholtz, the Moon Illusion, and Two Visual Systems.Helen E. Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):116-117.
Perception of Size.Aage Slomann - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):101 – 113.
Environmental Ethics and Size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
To Normalize or Not to Normalize for Overall Size?Francisco Aboitiz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):327-328.
ZF + "Every Set is the Same Size as a Wellfounded Set".Thomas Forster - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (1):1-4.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
33 ( #331,425 of 2,454,680 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,768 of 2,454,680 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes