Foundations of Science 22 (3):471-494 (2017)

Robert Rosenberger
Georgia Institute of Technology
The emerging school of thought called “postphenomenology” offers a distinct understanding of the ways that people experience technology usage. This perspective combines insights from the philosophical tradition of phenomenology with commitments to the anti-essentialism and nonfoundationalism of American pragmatism. One of postphenomenology’s central positions is that technologies always remain “multistable,” i.e., subject to different uses and meanings. But I suggest that as this perspective matures, philosophical problems are emerging around the notion of multistability, what I call “the problem of invariance” and “the problem of grounding.” These problems point out things that remain unclear within the postphenomenological framework, such as how it handles structural claims regarding a technology’s various stabilities, and how it grounds its claims. How can postphenomenology make structural claims about technology and yet remain anti-essentializing? And on what epistemological basis does it ground its claims about human-technology relations? The paper concludes with a series of prescriptions that, if followed, enable postphenomenology to make edifying claims about technology, all while avoiding the problems of invariance and grounding, and maintaining its commitments to anti-essentialism and nonfoundationalism.
Keywords Postphenomenology  Pragmatism  Nonfoundationalism  Multistability  Philosophy of technology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10699-015-9480-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Pandora’s Hope.Bruno Latour - 1998 - Harvard University Press.

View all 52 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The ICT Educator’s Fallacy.Robert Rosenberger - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (2):395-399.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Postphenomenology and the Politics of Sustainable Technology.Gert Goeminne - 2011 - Foundations of Science 16 (2-3):173-194.
Why Not Post-Political?Michel Puech - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (2):351-353.
Interview with Don Ihde.Laureano Ralon - 2010 - Figure/Ground Communication's Scholarly Interview Series.


Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #235,559 of 2,432,696 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #97,128 of 2,432,696 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes