On Whiteheadian Dualism: A Reply to Professor Griffin


Authors
Steven M. Rosen
College of Staten Island (CUNY)
Abstract
In this article, the author defends his claim that a subtle form of metaphysical dualism can be found in Alfred North Whitehead's central notion of the "actual occasion." Rosen contends that phenomenological philosophers such as Martin Heidegger go further than Whitehead in challenging traditional dualism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,548
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reflection on the Chances for a Scientific Dualism.Alan N. Sussman - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (February):95-118.
Is Dualism Religiously and Morally Pernicious?Gordon Barnes - 2004 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (1):99-106.
Dualism, Materialism, Idealism, and Psi: A Reply to John Palmer.David Ray Griffin - 1994 - Journal of the American Society of Psychical Research 88:23-39.
Professor Ryle's Attack on Dualism.Alfred C. Ewing - 1953 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 53:47-78.
Giving Dualism its Due.William G. Lycan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):551-563.
Is Property Dualism Better Off Than Substance Dualism?William G. Lycan - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (2):533-542.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-07-17

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes