Preferences and paternalism on freedom and deliberative democracy

Political Theory 33 (3):370 - 396 (2005)
Abstract
This article discusses the relationship between the ideal of autonomous preference formation and the danger of paternalism in deliberative democratic theory. It argues that the aim of autonomous preference formation can and should be decoupled from a justification of paternalistic state action aimed at reshaping citizens 'preferences. The problem of nonautonomous preference formation is rooted in the communication structure in which each and every one forms her preferences and hence cannot be solved by some paternalistically judging on others'behalf The argument is based on a new formulation of the deliberative democratic ideal, which emphasizes and clarifies the multiple dimensions of freedom it incorporates
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0090591704272351
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Freedom of Expression, Deliberation, Autonomy and Respect.Christian F. Rostbøll - 2011 - European Journal of Political Theory 10 (1):5-21.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-02-05

Total downloads
37 ( #151,564 of 2,211,068 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #380,765 of 2,211,068 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature