David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 21 (1):1-21 (2009)
In contrast to the vast literature on retributive theories of punishment, discussions of private revenge are rare in moral philosophy. This paper reviews some examples, from both classical and recent writers, finding uncertainty and equivocation over the ethical significance of acts of revenge, and in particular over their possible resemblances, in motive, purpose or justification, to acts of lawful punishment. A key problem for the coherence of our ethical conception of revenge is the consideration that certain acts of revenge may be just (at least in the minimal sense that the victim of revenge has no grounds for complaint against the revenger) and yet be generally agreed to be morally wrong. The challenge of explaining adequately why private revenge is morally wrong poses particular difficulty for purely retributive theories of punishment, since without invoking consequentialist reasons it does not seem possible adequately to motivate an objection to just and proportionate acts of revenge.
|Keywords||revenge retribution punishment retributivism consequentialism reciprocity provocation resentment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Manuel Escamilla-Castillo (2010). The Purposes of Legal Punishment. Ratio Juris 23 (4):460-478.
Similar books and articles
Shawn J. Bayern, The Significance of Private Burdens and Lost Benefits for a Fair-Play Analysis of Punishment.
Douglas Patterson (2007). Understanding the Liar. In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press. pp. 197.
Lester H. Hunt (1979). Punishment, Revenge, and the Minimal Functions of the State. Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy 1:79-88.
Robin Small (1997). Ressentiment, Revenge, and Punishment: Origins of the Nietzschean Critique. Utilitas 9 (1):39.
David Cartwright (1985). Revenge, Punishment, and Mercy. International Studies in Philosophy 17 (2):17-26.
Leo Zaibert (2006). Punishment and Revenge. Law and Philosophy 25 (1):81-118.
Brian Rosebury (2008). Respect for Just Revenge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):451-471.
Michael Davis (2000). Revenge, Victim's Rights, and Criminal Justice. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):119-128.
Charles Barton (2000). Getting Even Again. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):129-142.
Added to index2009-02-05
Total downloads101 ( #46,184 of 1,925,592 )
Recent downloads (6 months)38 ( #9,609 of 1,925,592 )
How can I increase my downloads?