Authors
Tobias Rosefeldt
Humboldt-University, Berlin
Abstract
Naturalized metaphysics is based on the idea that philosophy should be guided by the sciences. The paradigmatic science that is relevant for metaphysics is physics because physics tells us what fundamental reality is ultimately like. There are other sciences, however, that de facto play a role in philosophical inquiries about what there is, one of them being the science of language, i.e. linguistics. In this paper I will be concerned with the question what role linguistics should and does play for the metametaphysical question of how our views about fundamental reality can be reconciled with the everyday truisms about what there is. I will present several examples of two kinds of approaches to this question, linguistics-based accounts and purely philosophical accounts, and will discuss their respective methodological merits and shortcomings. In the end I will argue that even proponents of a purely philosophical answer to the metametaphysical question should take the results of linguistics seriously.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10838-017-9386-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,909
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aboutness.Stephen Yablo - 2014 - Princeton University Press.
Against Parthood.Theodore Sider - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 8:237–293.
Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - In James Ladyman, Don Ross, David Spurrett & John Collier (eds.), Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press.
What We Disagree About When We Disagree About Ontology.Cian Dorr - 2005 - In Mark Eli Kalderon (ed.), Fictionalism in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 234--86.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Commentary on Rosefeldt: Should Metaphysics Care About Ontological Commitment From Casual Utterances?Julia Göhner - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (2):179-186.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Commentary on Rosefeldt: Should Metaphysics Care About Ontological Commitment From Casual Utterances?Julia Göhner - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (2):179-186.
On Linguistics in Philosophy, and Philosophy in Linguistics.James Higginbotham - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5-6):573-584.
Postmodern (Applied) Linguistics.Martin Stegu - 2011 - Semiotica 2011 (183):343-357.
Rethinking Linguistics.Hayley G. Davis - 2003 - Routledgecurzon.
Usage-Based Linguistics and the Magic Number Four.Clarence Green - 2017 - Cognitive Linguistics 28 (2):209-237.
Existentialism and Metaphysics.Philip Leon - 1953 - Philosophy 28 (107):342 - 347.
The Question of Metaphysics.Jessica Wilson - 2016 - The Philosophers' Magazine:90-96.
Remarks on the Metaphysics of Linguistics.James Higginbotham - 1991 - Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (5):555 - 566.
Concerning the Role of Consciousness in Linguistics.Isa Itkonen - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (6):15-33.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-02-24

Total views
48 ( #206,563 of 2,402,085 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #105,108 of 2,402,085 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes