‘That’-Clauses and Non-nominal Quantification

Philosophical Studies 137 (3):301 - 333 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that ‘that’-clauses are not singular terms (without denying that their semantical values are propositions). In its first part, three arguments are presented to support the thesis, two of which are defended against recent criticism. The two good arguments are based on the observation that substitution of ‘the proposition that p’ for ‘that p’ may result in ungrammaticality. The second part of the paper is devoted to a refutation of the main argument for the claim that ‘that’-clauses are singular terms, namely that this claim is needed in order to account for the possibility of quantification into ‘that’-clause position. It is shown that not all quantification in natural languages is quantification into the position of singular terms, but that there is also so-called ‘non-nominal quantification’. A formal analysis of non-nominal quantification is given, and it is argued that quantification into ‘that’-clause position can be treated as another kind non-nominal quantification.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond Plurals.Agust\’in Rayo - 2006 - In Agust\’in Rayo & Gabriel Uzquiano (eds.), Absolute Generality. Oxford University Press. pp. 220--54.
On What There Are.Philippe De Rouilhan - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102:183 - 200.
On quantifying into predicate position: Steps towards a new (tralist) perspective.Crispin Wright - 2007 - In Mary Leng, Alexander Paseau & Michael Potter (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press. pp. 150--74.
Indenumerability and substitutional quantification.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1982 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (4):358-366.
Certain Verbs Are Syntactically Explicit Quantifiers.Anna Szabolcsi - 2011 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6:5.
Truth via Sentential Quantification.Mark Textor - 2005 - Dialogue 44 (3):539-550.
Prior and Lorenzen on Quantification.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1991 - Grazer Philosophishe Studien 41:150-173.
Quantification in English is Inherently Sortal.Edward L. Keenan - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):251-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
202 (#90,470)

6 months
10 (#134,835)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tobias Rosefeldt
Humboldt-University, Berlin

Citations of this work

Higher‐order metaphysics.Lukas Skiba - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (10):1-11.
Hopes, Fears, and Other Grammatical Scarecrows.Jacob M. Nebel - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (1):63-105.
Propositions and Cognitive Relations.Nicholas K. Jones - 2019 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119 (2):157-178.
Prior's puzzle generalized.Justin D'Ambrosio - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 106 (1):196-220.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The things we mean.Stephen R. Schiffer - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Conceptions of truth.Wolfgang Künne - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Objects of thought.Arthur Norman Prior - 1971 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press. Edited by P. T. Geach & Anthony Kenny.
Syntax and semantics of questions.Lauri Karttunen - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1):3--44.
Everything.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):415–465.

View all 45 references / Add more references