Science and Society 63 (3):283 - 309 (1999)
At least since the publication of Roman Rosdolsky's "The Making of Marx's Capital", the Grundrisse has been an essential reference for anyone wishing to demonstrate a significant dependence of Marx's political economy upon Hegelian "logic." Contrary to Rosdolsky's interpretation, however, the "Grundrisse" can in fact be read as the drama of Marx's escape from his Hegelian philosophical heritage. Hegel's "dialectical method" is not a method of logical argumentation, but a "method" of paralogical mystification. Marx's own attempts to construct "dialectical derivations" of economic categories in the "Grundrisse" lead him into theoretical culs-desac, and he is only able to make real progress in his economic investigations by precisely foregoing such adventures. The persistence, nonetheless, of certain characteristically Hegelian formulae—though, n. b., not characteristically Hegelian argumentational structures—in "Capital", and especially in the first chapter, is a function of the ontological peculiarity of Marx's initial object of inquiry, viz., money, and does not reflect any "methodological" choice. Marx's arguments in "Capital" are not "dialectical" but rather "transcendental" in nature, starting from given market phenomena (prices, profit, etc.) and working back to their conditions of possibility.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marx's Inferential Commitment to Hegel's Idealism in the Grundrisse.Matthew J. Smetona - 2012 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):351-372.
The Relevance of Systematic Dialectics to Marxian Thought: A Reply to Rosenthal.Tony Smith - 1999 - Historical Materialism 4 (1):215-240.
Reflections on the Economic Crisis. The Transcendental Character of Money: An Exposition of Karl Marx’s Argument in the Grundrisse.J. F. Humphrey - 2010 - Nordicum-Mediterraneum, Vol. 5, No. 1 (March 2010) 5 (1).
Correct Rosenthal Reference Communications on Rosenthal's “Escape” From Hegel.Tony Smith - manuscript
Marx's Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Nature.John L. Stanley - 1997 - Science and Society 61 (4):449 - 473.
The Logic of Marx's Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticisms.Tony Smith - 1990 - State University of New York Press.
The Existential Dialectic of Marx and Merleau-Ponty.Douglas Beck Low - 1987 - P. Lang.
Individual and Society in Marx and Hegel: Beyond the Communitarian Critique of Liberalism.Sean Sayers - 2007 - Science and Society 71 (1):84 - 102.
The Dialectic of Capital : An Unoist Interpretation.Thomas T. Sekine - 2008 - In Bertell Ollman & Tony Smith (eds.), Science and Society. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 434 - 445.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads14 ( #331,377 of 2,164,556 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,948 of 2,164,556 )
How can I increase my downloads?