The justification of induction

Philosophy of Science 59 (4):527-539 (1992)
We show there is only one consistent way to update a probability assignment, that given by Bayes's rule. The price of inconsistent updating is a loss of efficiency. The implications of this for the problem of induction are discussed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289693
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,780
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Bayesian Boom: Good Thing or Bad?Ulrike Hahn - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Justification of Induction.Richard Swinburne (ed.) - 1974 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Counter-Induction.John L. Pollock - 1962 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):284 – 294.
Induction and Justification.Frederick L. Will - 1974 - Ithaca [N.Y.]Cornell University Press.
Induction and Objectivity.F. John Clendinnen - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (3):215-229.
Inference, Practice and Theory.F. John Clendinnen - 1977 - Synthese 34 (1):89 - 132.
The Rationality of Induction.D. C. Stove - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
The Problem of Induction.James Cargile - 1998 - Philosophy 73 (2):247-275.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
250 ( #16,009 of 2,214,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,895 of 2,214,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature