The notion of progress in evolutionary biology – the unresolved problem and an empirical suggestion

Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):41-70 (2006)
Modern biology is ambivalent about the notion of evolutionary progress. Although most evolutionists imply in their writings that they still understand large-scale macroevolution as a somewhat progressive process, the use of the term “progress” is increasingly criticized and avoided. The paper shows that this ambivalence has a long history and results mainly from three problems: (1) The term “progress” carries historical, theoretical and social implications which are not congruent with modern knowledge of the course of evolution; (2) An incongruence exists between the notion of progress and Darwin’s theory of selection; (3) It is still not possible to give more than a rudimentary definition of the general patterns that were generated during the macroevolution of organisms. The paper consists of two parts: the first is a historical overview of the roots of the term “progress” in evolutionary biology, the second discusses epistemological, ontological and empirical problems. It is stated that the term has so far served as a metaphor for general patterns generated amongst organisms during evolution. It is proposed that a reformulation is needed to eliminate historically imported implications and that it is necessary to develop a concept for an appropriate empirical description of macroevolutionary patterns. This is the third way between, on the one hand, using the term indiscriminately and, on the other hand, ignoring the general patterns that evolution has produced.
Keywords Biological autonomy  Complexity  Directionality  Epistemology  Evolutionary progress  History  Macroevolution  Trends
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-005-0957-4
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,472
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist.Ernst Mayr - 1988 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. [REVIEW]Joe Cain - 1999 - Journal of the History of Biology 32 (1):197-204.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Schelling, Hegel, and Evolutionary Progress.J. M. Fritzman & Molly Gibson - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (1):105-128.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Gomte and the Idea of Progress.Leslie Sklair - 1968 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):321 – 331.
Popper, Falsifiability, and Evolutionary Biology.David N. Stamos - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.
Against Darwinism.Jerry Fodor - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (1):1–24.
On the Notion of Evolutionary Progress.Kai Hahlweg - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):436-451.
Progress in Evolutionary Economics.James Maclaurin & Tim Cochrane - 2012 - Journal of Bioeconomics 14 (2):101-14.
Two Explanations of Evolutionary Progress.Gregory Radick - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (4):475-491.
Methodological and Contextual Factors in the Dawkins/Gould Dispute Over Evolutionary Progress.T. Shanahan - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (1):127-151.
Development, Evolution, and Adaptation.Kim Sterelny - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):387.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
44 ( #125,545 of 2,210,833 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #207,668 of 2,210,833 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature