Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):41-70 (2006)

Abstract
Modern biology is ambivalent about the notion of evolutionary progress. Although most evolutionists imply in their writings that they still understand large-scale macroevolution as a somewhat progressive process, the use of the term “progress” is increasingly criticized and avoided. The paper shows that this ambivalence has a long history and results mainly from three problems: (1) The term “progress” carries historical, theoretical and social implications which are not congruent with modern knowledge of the course of evolution; (2) An incongruence exists between the notion of progress and Darwin’s theory of selection; (3) It is still not possible to give more than a rudimentary definition of the general patterns that were generated during the macroevolution of organisms. The paper consists of two parts: the first is a historical overview of the roots of the term “progress” in evolutionary biology, the second discusses epistemological, ontological and empirical problems. It is stated that the term has so far served as a metaphor for general patterns generated amongst organisms during evolution. It is proposed that a reformulation is needed to eliminate historically imported implications and that it is necessary to develop a concept for an appropriate empirical description of macroevolutionary patterns. This is the third way between, on the one hand, using the term indiscriminately and, on the other hand, ignoring the general patterns that evolution has produced.
Keywords Biological autonomy  Complexity  Directionality  Epistemology  Evolutionary progress  History  Macroevolution  Trends
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-005-0957-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 46 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Selectionist Rationale for Evolutionary Progress.Hugh Desmond - 2021 - Biology and Philosophy 36 (3):1-26.
Natural Selection, Plasticity, and the Rationale for Largest-Scale Trends.Hugh Desmond - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 68:25-33.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Gomte and the Idea of Progress.Leslie Sklair - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):321 – 331.
Methodological and Contextual Factors in the Dawkins/Gould Dispute Over Evolutionary Progress.Timothy Shanahan - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (1):127-151.
Two Explanations of Evolutionary Progress.Gregory Radick - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (4):475-491.
Progress in Evolutionary Economics.James Maclaurin & Tim Cochrane - 2012 - Journal of Bioeconomics 14 (2):101-14.
On the Notion of Evolutionary Progress.Kai Hahlweg - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):436-451.
Against Darwinism.Jerry Fodor - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (1):1–24.
Popper, Falsifiability, and Evolutionary Biology.David N. Stamos - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.
Development, Evolution, and Adaptation.Kim Sterelny - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):387.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
58 ( #194,387 of 2,499,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,823 of 2,499,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes