Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):41-70 (2006)
Modern biology is ambivalent about the notion of evolutionary progress. Although most evolutionists imply in their writings that they still understand large-scale macroevolution as a somewhat progressive process, the use of the term “progress” is increasingly criticized and avoided. The paper shows that this ambivalence has a long history and results mainly from three problems: (1) The term “progress” carries historical, theoretical and social implications which are not congruent with modern knowledge of the course of evolution; (2) An incongruence exists between the notion of progress and Darwin’s theory of selection; (3) It is still not possible to give more than a rudimentary definition of the general patterns that were generated during the macroevolution of organisms. The paper consists of two parts: the first is a historical overview of the roots of the term “progress” in evolutionary biology, the second discusses epistemological, ontological and empirical problems. It is stated that the term has so far served as a metaphor for general patterns generated amongst organisms during evolution. It is proposed that a reformulation is needed to eliminate historically imported implications and that it is necessary to develop a concept for an appropriate empirical description of macroevolutionary patterns. This is the third way between, on the one hand, using the term indiscriminately and, on the other hand, ignoring the general patterns that evolution has produced.
|Keywords||Biological autonomy Complexity Directionality Epistemology Evolutionary progress History Macroevolution Trends|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
On the Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.Charles Darwin - 2008 - Sterling.
The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment.Richard C. Lewontin - 2000 - Harvard University Press.
Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist.Ernst Mayr - 1988 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Autonomy in Evolution: From Minimal to Complex Life.Kepa Ruiz-Mirazo & Alvaro Moreno - 2012 - Synthese 185 (1):21-52.
The Theory of Increasing Autonomy in Evolution: A Proposal for Understanding Macroevolutionary Innovations.Bernd Rosslenbroich - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (5):623-644.
Schelling, Hegel, and Evolutionary Progress.J. M. Fritzman & Molly Gibson - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (1):105-128.
The 'Division of Physiological Labour': The Birth, Life and Death of a Concept. [REVIEW]Emmanuel D'hombres - 2012 - Journal of the History of Biology 45 (1):3 - 31.
The ‘Division of Physiological Labour’: The Birth, Life and Death of a Concept.Emmanuel D’Hombres - 2012 - Journal of the History of Biology 45 (1):3-31.
Similar books and articles
Popper, Falsifiability, and Evolutionary Biology.David N. Stamos - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.
Progress Through Evolution? An Inquiry Into the Thought of C.H. Waddington.Kai Hahlweg - 1981 - Acta Biotheoretica 30 (2):103-120.
Progress in Evolutionary Economics.James Maclaurin & Tim Cochrane - 2012 - Journal of Bioeconomics 14 (2):101-14.
Two Explanations of Evolutionary Progress.Gregory Radick - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (4):475-491.
The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology.Timothy Shanahan - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Methodological and Contextual Factors in the Dawkins/Gould Dispute Over Evolutionary Progress.T. Shanahan - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (1):127-151.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #129,767 of 2,143,548 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,274 of 2,143,548 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.