Frontiers in Psychology 4 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
I propose a narrative fabrication thesis of dream reports, according to which dream reports are often not accurate representations of experiences that occur during sleep. I begin with an overview of anti-experience theses of Norman Malcolm and Daniel Dennett who reject the received view of dreams, that dreams are experiences we have during sleep which are reported upon waking. Although rejection of the first claim of the received view, that dreams are experiences that occur during sleep, is implausible, I evaluate in more detail the second assumption of the received view, that dream reports are generally accurate. I then propose a “narrative fabrication” view of dreams as an alternative to the received view. Dream reports are often confabulated or fabricated because of poor memory, bizarre dream content, and cognitive deficits. It is well documented that narratives can be altered between initial rapid eye movement sleep awakenings and subsequent reports. I argue that we have reason to suspect that initial reports are prone to inaccuracy. Experiments demonstrate that subjects rationalize strange elements in narratives, leaving out supernatural or bizarre components when reporting waking memories of stories. Inaccuracies in dream reports are exacerbated by rapid memory loss and bizarre dream content. Waking memory is a process of reconstruction and blending of elements, but unlike waking memory, we cannot reality-test for dream memories. Dream experiences involve imaginative elements, and dream content cannot be verified with external evidence. Some dreams may involve wake-like higher cognitive functions, such as lucid dreams. Such dreams are more likely to elicit accurate reports than cognitively deficient dreams. However, dream reports are generally less accurate than waking reports. I then propose methods which could verify the narrative fabrication view, and argue that although the theory cannot be tested with current methods, new techniques and technologies may be able to do so in the future.
|
Keywords | Dreams confabulation scepticism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of theSelf.Thomas Metzinger - 2009 - Basic Books.
Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism.John Sutton - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Dreaming and the Brain: Toward a Cognitive Neuroscience of Conscious States.J. Allan Hobson, Edward F. Pace-Schott & Robert Stickgold - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):793-842; 904-1018; 1083-1121.
Consciousness, Dreams and Virtual Realities.Antti Revonsuo - 1995 - Philosophical Psychology 8 (1):35-58.
View all 35 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Why Are Dreams Interesting for Philosophers? The Example of Minimal Phenomenal Selfhood, Plus an Agenda for Future Research.Thomas Metzinger - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4:746.
Enactive or Inactive? Cranially Envatted Dream Experience and the Extended Conscious Mind.M. G. Rosen - 2018 - Philosophical Explorations 21 (2):295-318.
Similar books and articles
I Know How You Felt Last Night, or Do I? Self- and External Ratings of Emotions in REM Sleep Dreams.Pilleriin Sikka, Katja Valli, Tiina Virta & Antti Revonsuo - 2014 - Consciousness and Cognition 25:51-66.
Dreams.Thomas Metzinger & Jennifer Michelle Windt - 2007 - In D. Barrett & P. McNamara (eds.), The New Science of Dreaming. Praeger Publishers.
Dream Content: Individual and Generic Aspects☆.Allan Hobson & David Kahn - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (4):850-858.
Studying Dream Content Using the Archive and Search Engine on DreamBank.Net.G. William Domhoff & Adam Schneider - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (4):1238-1247.
Bizarreness in Dreams and Fantasies: Implications for the Activation-Synthesis Hypothesis.J. Williams - 1992 - Consciousness and Cognition 1 (2):172-185.
State-Dependent Thinking: A Comparison of Waking and Dreaming Thought.David Kahn & J. Allan Hobson - 2005 - Consciousness and Cognition 14 (3):429-438.
Self‐Representation and Perspectives in Dreams.John Sutton Melanie Rosen - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (11):1041-1053.
Self‐Representation and Perspectives in Dreams.Melanie Rosen & John Sutton - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (11):1041-1053.
The Anomalous Foundations of Dream Telling: Objective Solipsism and the Problem of Meaning. [REVIEW]Richard A. Hilbert - 2010 - Human Studies 33 (1):41-64.
Oneiric Activity in Schizophrenia: Textual Analysis of Dream Reports.Marco Zanasi, Fabrizio Calisti, Giorgio Di Lorenzo, Giulia Valerio & Alberto Siracusano - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (2):337-348.
A Replication Of The 5–7 Day Dream-Lag Effect With Comparison Of Dreams To Future Events As Control For Baseline Matching. [REVIEW]Mark Blagrove, Josie Henley-Einion, Amanda Barnett, Darren Edwards & C. Seage - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (2):384-391.
A Replication of the 5–7day Dream-Lag Effect with Comparison of Dreams to Future Events as Control for Baseline Matching. [REVIEW]Mark Blagrove, Josie Henley-Einion, Amanda Barnett, Darren Edwards & C. Heidi Seage - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (2):384-391.
Cognitive and Emotional Processes During Dreaming: A Neuroimaging View.Martin Desseilles, Thien Thanh Dang-Vu, Virginie Sterpenich & Sophie Schwartz - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):998-1008.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-01-12
Total views
148 ( #64,219 of 2,403,169 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #29,853 of 2,403,169 )
2018-01-12
Total views
148 ( #64,219 of 2,403,169 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #29,853 of 2,403,169 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads