- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What Rosenberg's philosophy of economics is not
Philosophy of Science 53 (1):127-132 (1986)
Abstract
Douglas W. Hands's “What Economics Is Not: An Economist's Response to Rosenberg“ is an unsympathetic criticism of the explanatory hypotheses of “If Economics Isn't Science, What Is It?”. Before replying to his objection, I summarize the claims of that paper.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The past recaptured: Mongin on the problem of realism in economics.Alexander Rosenberg - 1988 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (3):379-381.
Economics: mathematical politics or science of diminishing returns?Alexander Rosenberg - 1992 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Economics is Too Important to Be Left to the Rhetoricians.Alexander Rosenberg - 1988 - Economics and Philosophy 4 (1):129.
Lakatosian Consolations for Economics.Alexander Rosenberg - 1986 - Economics and Philosophy 2 (1):127.
Economics - Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Rosenberg Alexander. University of Chicago Press, 1992, xvii + 266 pages. [REVIEW]A. W. Coats - 1995 - Economics and Philosophy 11 (2):386.
Rhetoric is not Important Enough for Economists to Bother About.Alexander Rosenberg - 1988 - Economics and Philosophy 4 (1):173.
Friedman's 'methodology' for economics: A critical examination.Alexander Rosenberg - 1972 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2 (1):15-29.
Prospects for the Elimination of Tastes from Economics and Ethics.Alexander Rosenberg - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):48.
What economics is not: An economist's response to Rosenberg.Douglas W. Hands - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (3):495-503.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
135 (#131,586)
6 months
5 (#526,961)
2009-01-28
Downloads
135 (#131,586)
6 months
5 (#526,961)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Diversity of Rational Choice Theory: A Review Note.Catherine Https://Orcidorg Herfeld - 2020 - Topoi 39 (2):329-347.
References found in this work
Theories, theorists and theoretical change.Philip Kitcher - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (4):519-547.
Proofs and refutations (I).Imre Lakatos - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (53):1-25.
Review symposium : Can economic theory explain everything?Alexander Rosenberg - 1979 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (4):509-529.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-v4fj8 uwo