Chaos, Clio, and Scientistic Illusions of Understanding

History and Theory 34 (1):30-44 (1995)

Paul A. Roth
University of California, Santa Cruz
A number of authors have recently argued that the mathematical insights of "chaos theory" offer a promising formal model or significant analogy for understanding at least some historical events. We examine a representative claim of each kind regarding the application of chaos theory to problems of historical explanation. We identify two lines of argument. One we term the Causal Thesis, which states that chaos theory may be used to plausibly model, and so explain, historical events. The other we term the Convergence Thesis, which holds that, once the analogy between history and chaos theory is properly appreciated, any temptation to divide history from the rest of science should be greatly lessened. We argue that the proffered analogy between chaos theory and history falls apart upon closer analysis. The promised benefits of chaos theory vis-à-vis history are either fantastic or, at best, an extremely loose heuristic which, while retaining nothing of the considerable intrinsic interest of nonlinear dynamics, easily seduces the unwary into taking at face value terms and concepts that have a specifically precise meaning only within the confines of mathematical theory
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2505582
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,350
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Two Conceptions of Fundamentality.Mariam Thalos - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (2):151-177.
Time, Modernity and Time Irreversibility.Elias José Palti - 1997 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (5):27-62.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Illusion of Depth of Understanding in Science.Petri Ylikoski - 2009 - In Henk De Regt, Sabina Leonelli & Kai Eigner (eds.), Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 100--119.
A Philosophical Evaluation of the Chaos Theory "Revolution".Stephen H. Kellert - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:33 - 49.
Idealizations and Scientific Understanding.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):237-252.
A «Chaos of Being»: Carlyle and the Shandean Web of History.John B. Lamb - 1990 - Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 20 (1):23-37.
Scientific Understanding.Peter Kosso - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (2):173-188.
Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish].Luca Mori - 2013 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 18:100-123.
EMU and Inference: What the Explanatory Model of Scientific Understanding Ignores.Mark Newman - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (1):55-74.
Society and Chaos: Schiller's Impact on Cartyli's Ideas About Revolution.Tom Lloyd - 1987 - Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 17 (1):51-64.
Strange Attraction, Curious Liaison-Clio Meets Chaos.Charles Dyke - 1990 - Philosophical Forum 21 (4):369-392.
The Psychology of Scientific Explanation.J. D. Trout - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (3):564–591.


Added to PP index

Total views
45 ( #200,838 of 2,291,129 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #578,506 of 2,291,129 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature