Der Grundsatz der Menschenwürde und das Problem des „Zwecks an-sich“

Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 94 (4):421-433 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the current theoretical discourse, human dignity as it is enshrined in the German Basic Law, is often interpreted as a special „right to non-instrumentalization“ which overturns any other human right. This interpretation usually refers to Kant’s concept of human dignity, according to which any person is an “end-in-itself”. By discussing the different possibilities on how to understand this idea, I want to point out that none of possible interpretations of Kant’s concept can give good reasons for an understanding of human dignity as a special “right to non-instrumentalization”. Instead I propose to understand human dignity as the principle of and the reason for the absolute inviolability of basic human rights.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,362

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human Dignity in Liechtenstein.Cyrus Beck - 2019 - In Paolo Becchi & Klaus Mathis (eds.), Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe. Springer Verlag. pp. 505-524.
Human dignity as a right.Shaoping Gan - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):370-384.
Human Dignity in Germany.Christoph Enders - 2019 - In Paolo Becchi & Klaus Mathis (eds.), Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe. Springer Verlag. pp. 281-318.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-07

Downloads
9 (#1,484,557)

6 months
5 (#911,049)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references