Synthese 136 (3):389 - 408 (2003)
A suggestion famously made by Peter Winch and carried through to present discussions holds that what constitutes the social as a kind consists of something shared -- rules or practices commonly learned, internalized, or otherwise acquired by all members belonging to a society. This essays argues against the explanatory efficacy of appeals to this shared something as constitutive of a social kind by examining a violation of social norms or rules, viz., mistakes. I argue that an asymmetric relation exists between the notion of mistakes and that of the social. In particular, mistakes do not presuppose a concept of the social, but the concept of the social requires prior specification of a category of mistakes. But no such prior specification proves possible. The very notion of a mistake is so inchoate that it makes it impossible to provide the kind of regimentation required for a rule-governed domain. Thus, there may be recognized mistakes even in the absence of a unified system or common knowledge of norms. Later writers attempt to avoid Winch's over-strong assumption that something shared and internal constitutes the social but cannot. Extending recent work by Stephen Turner, I argue that "the social" is not a domain that is susceptible to lawlike treatment, but rather a heterogeneous, motley collection. For absent the assumption of a shared something, no social object exists to be explained. So, I conclude, we have at present no clear way of marking out the social as a coherent or unified domain of inquiry.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Metaphysics Philosophy of Language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Quo Vadis? Quine's Web, Kuhn's Revolutions, and Baert's “Way Forward”. [REVIEW]Paul A. Roth - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (3):357 - 363.
Normativism, Anti-Normativism and Humanist Pragmatism.Maksymilian Del Mar - 2010 - Human Studies 33 (2):305-323.
Quo Vadis? Quine’s Web, Kuhn’s Revolutions, and Baert’s “Way Forward”.Paul A. Roth - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (3):357-363.
Similar books and articles
A Critique of Max Weber's Philosophy of Social Science.W. G. Runciman - 1972 - Cambridge University Press.
Two Mistakes Regarding the Principal Principle.Christopher J. G. Meacham - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):407-431.
Social Genomics: Genomic Inventions in Society.Rachelle D. Hollander - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):485-496.
On the Art of Being Wrong: An Essay on the Dialectic of Errors.Sverre Wide - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):573-588.
Bad Apples: Feminist Politics and Feminist Scholarship.Alan Soble - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):354-388.
Wittgenstein, Durkheim, Garfinkel and Winch: Constitutive Orders of Sensemaking.Anne Warfield Rawls - 2011 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (4):396-418.
Facts, Law, Exculpation, and Inculpation: Comments on Simons.Larry Alexander - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):241-245.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads86 ( #59,692 of 2,158,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)23 ( #16,358 of 2,158,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?