Norm enactment and performative contradictions

Ratio Juris 22 (4):455-482 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the role of performative contradictions in legal discourse. First of all we identify the argumentative roles of performative contradictions and two possible interpretations of them. With this done, we show that one use of performative contradictions can be fruitfully applied in analysing normative speech acts implementing norm enactment, namely, those speech acts that are designed to produce new legal norms. We conclude the paper by showing that our analysis provides strong support for Robert Alexy's claim-to-correctness thesis, according to which speech acts of the norm-enacting kind raise a claim to correctness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Speech and system.Peter Bornedal - 1997 - Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
I. a comment on performative, subject, and proposition in Habermas's theory of communication.Erling Skjei - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):87 – 105.
Performatives and descriptions.Gerard A. Radnitzky - 1962 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):12 – 45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-26

Downloads
54 (#284,714)

6 months
11 (#202,259)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Corrado Roversi
Università degli Studi di Bologna

References found in this work

How to do things with words.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts.John Rogers Searle - 1979 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
The Concept of Law.Stuart M. Brown - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (2):250.

View all 21 references / Add more references