Ratio Juris 22 (4):455-482 (2009)

Corrado Roversi
Università degli Studi di Bologna
In this paper we investigate the role of performative contradictions in legal discourse. First of all we identify the argumentative roles of performative contradictions and two possible interpretations of them. With this done, we show that one use of performative contradictions can be fruitfully applied in analysing normative speech acts implementing norm enactment, namely, those speech acts that are designed to produce new legal norms. We conclude the paper by showing that our analysis provides strong support for Robert Alexy's claim-to-correctness thesis, according to which speech acts of the norm-enacting kind raise a claim to correctness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2009.00435.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,723
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
The Concept of Law.Stuart M. Brown - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (2):250.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #274,718 of 2,333,783 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #585,936 of 2,333,783 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes