Religious cognition as interpreted experience: An examination of Ian Barbour's comparison of the epistemic structures of science and religion

Zygon 20 (3):265-282 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

. Using as a model contemporary analyses of scientific cognition, Ian Harbour has claimed that religious cognition is neither immediate nor inferential but has the structure of interpreted experience. Although I contend that Barbour has failed to establish his claim, I believe his views about the similarities between scientific and religious cognition are well founded. Thus on that basis I offer an alternative proposal that theistic religious cognition is essentially inferential and that religious experience is in fact the use of inferentially acquired religious beliefs to interpret ordinary nonreligious experiences

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
58 (#271,353)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William A. Rottschaefer
Boston University (PhD)

References found in this work

The Structure of scientific theories.Frederick Suppe (ed.) - 1974 - Urbana,: University of Illinois Press.
Language, epistemology, and mysticism.Steven T. Katz - 1978 - In Mysticism and philosophical analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 22--74.
Mysticism and philosophical analysis.Steven T. Katz (ed.) - 1978 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references