Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):45-57 (1977)
attempt to justify the State, or at least a minimal State confined to the functions of protection. Beginning with a free-market anarchist state of nature, Nozick portrays the State as emerging, by an invisible hand process that violates no one’s rights, first as a dominant protective agency, then to an "ultra-minimal state," and then finally to a minimal state. Before embarking on a detailed critique of the various Nozickian stages, let us consider several grave fallacies in Nozick’s conception itself, each of which would in itself be sufficient..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Review of Dale F. Murray, Nozick, Autonomy and Compensation. [REVIEW]Peter Vallentyne - 2007 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (12).
One Step Beyond Nozick's Minimal State: The Role of Forced Exchanges in Political Theory.Richard A. Epstein - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):286-313.
Side Constraints.Robert Nozick - 1988 - In Samuel Scheffler (ed.), Consequentialism and its Critics. Oxford University Press.
The Free Market Model Versus Government: A Reply to Nozick.John T. Sanders - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):35-44.
Whither Anarchy? Has Robert Nozick Justified the State?Randy Barnett - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):15-21.
The Framework for Utopia.Ralf M. Bader - 2011 - In The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's 'Anarchy, State, and Utopia'. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-02-16
Total downloads125 ( #39,235 of 2,178,181 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,143 of 2,178,181 )
How can I increase my downloads?