Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):91-114 (2000)
An appreciation of Hume’s psychology of object identity allows us to recognize certain tensions in his discussion of the origin of our belief in personal identity---tensions which have gone largely unnoticed in the secondary literature. This will serve to provide a new solution to the problem of explaining why Hume finds that discussion of personal identity so problematic when he famously disavows it in the Appendix to the Treatise. It turns out that the two psychological mechanisms which respectively generate the ideas of object and of personal identity are mutually incompatible. It is this sort of conflict within Hume’s introspective or subjectivist psychology which is the source of his worry
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Identity of Persons and Objects: Why Hume Considered Both as Two Sides of the Same Coin.Anik Waldow - 2010 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (2):147-167.
Similar books and articles
Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem?E. Furberg - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
Human Beings Have No Identical Self.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2008 - Proceedings of the 20th Conference of All Orissa Philosophy Association (20):198-210.
Hume’s Discussion on the Personal Identity.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2005 - Bihar Jounal of Philosophical Research (00):189-197.
Once More Into the Labyrinth: Kail's Realist Explanation of Hume's Second Thoughts About Personal Identity.Don Garrett - 2010 - Hume Studies 36 (1):77-87.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads84 ( #60,305 of 2,153,489 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #105,172 of 2,153,489 )
How can I increase my downloads?