Corroboration and Auxiliary Hypotheses: Duhem's Thesis Revisited

Synthese 177 (1):139-149 (2010)
Abstract
This paper argues that Duhem’s thesis does not decisively refute a corroboration-based account of scientific methodology (or ‘falsificationism’), but instead that auxiliary hypotheses are themselves subject to measurements of corroboration which can be used to inform practice. It argues that a corroboration-based account is equal to the popular Bayesian alternative, which has received much more recent attention, in this respect.
Keywords Corroboration  Falsificationism  Duhem's Thesis  Quine-Duhem Thesis  Confirmation  Popper
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-009-9643-4
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,861
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory.Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem - 1954 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
The Rationality of Science.W. Newton-Smith - 1981 - Routledge & Kegan Paul.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl R. Popper - 1960 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Kuhn Vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level.Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):117-124.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-08-16

Total downloads
253 ( #15,395 of 2,210,666 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #228,327 of 2,210,666 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature