Synthese 177 (1):139-149 (2010)

Darrell P. Rowbottom
Lingnan University
This paper argues that Duhem’s thesis does not decisively refute a corroboration-based account of scientific methodology (or ‘falsificationism’), but instead that auxiliary hypotheses are themselves subject to measurements of corroboration which can be used to inform practice. It argues that a corroboration-based account is equal to the popular Bayesian alternative, which has received much more recent attention, in this respect.
Keywords Corroboration  Falsificationism  Duhem's Thesis  Quine-Duhem Thesis  Confirmation  Popper
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-009-9643-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,949
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory.Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem - 1954 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kuhn Vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):117-124.
Una reivindicación de los experimentos cruciales.Alejandro Cassini - 2015 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 40 (1):105-137.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
299 ( #27,013 of 2,409,860 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #87,234 of 2,409,860 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes