Ending the Use of Animals in Toxicity Testing and Risk Evaluation

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):448-458 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Use of Animals in Toxicity Studies.Andrew N. Rowan - 2023 - In Erick Valdés & Juan Alberto Lecaros, Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I: Decisions at the Bench. Springer Verlag. pp. 563-574.
Intention, Foresight, and Ending Life.Andrew Mcgee - 2013 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (1):77-85.
Commentary: A Belmont Report for Animals? Rights or Welfare?Lori Marino - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):67-70.
The Risk in Living Kidney Donation.Walter Glannon - 2018 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (1):29-35.
C. Ciesielski-Carlucd, N. Milliken.Robert S. Van Howe - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (1):88-92.
Commentary: A Belmont Report for Animals: An Idea Whose Time Has Come.Alka Chandna - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):46-53.
Conceptual Issues in COVID-19 Pandemic: An Example of Global Catastrophic Risk.Konrad Szocik - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (1):199-202.
Capabilities are important, frequent use.Gregory F. Pratt - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
62 (#369,077)

6 months
3 (#1,157,458)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Hope of Progress.P. B. Medawar - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 35 (3):682-683.

Add more references