British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):561-566 (1993)
Stove attempts to undermine Hume's argument on induction by denying Hume the claim that induction presupposes the uniformity of nature. I argue that Stove's attack on Hume's argument fails. *A paper from which the present piece was derived was read at the Hume Symposium. Flinders Medical Centre, South Australia, in July 1990, where George Couvalis and David Gauthier made helpful criticisms of my argument.
|Keywords||Hume Induction Probability Stove|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Book Review:The Rationality of Induction D. C. Stove. [REVIEW]M. Giaquinto - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (4):612-.
The Rationality of Induction By D. C. Stove Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986, 231 Pp., £22.50. [REVIEW]David Miller - 1988 - Philosophy 63 (244):286-.
Hume, Induction, and the Irish.D. C. Stove - 1976 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (2):140 – 147.
Psychology, Epistemology, and Skepticism in Hume's Argument About Induction.Louis E. Loeb - 2006 - Synthese 152 (3):321 - 338.
Randomness and the Justification of Induction.Campbell Scott & Franklin James - 2004 - Synthese 138 (1):79 - 99.
An Argument By Stove Against Inductive Scepticism.Andrew Pickin - 2006 - Dissertation, University of Cambridge
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads227 ( #16,358 of 2,169,997 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,217 of 2,169,997 )
How can I increase my downloads?