Philosophical Review 67 (July):353-366 (1958)

Authors
Rozeboom Rozeboom
University of Alberta
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Analyticity  Color  Incompatibility  Logic  Object  Statement  Pap, A  Putnam, H
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2182396
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

'Basic Color Categories' in the Language-Game Perspective.Ondřej Beran - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19 (4):423-443.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Solving the Color Incompatibility Problem.Sarah Moss - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (5):841-851.
The Relational Nature of Color.Edward Wilson Averill - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (3):551-88.
Reds, Greens, and Logical Analysis.Hilary Putnam - 1956 - Philosophical Review 65 (April):206-217.
Color Objectivism and Color Projectivism.Edward Wilson Averill & Allan Hazlett - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (6):751 - 765.
Color Experience: A Semantic Theory.Mohan Matthen - 2010 - In Jonathan Cohen & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Color Ontology and Color Science. MIT Press. pp. 67--90.
Incompatibility Statements.D. J. Srzednicki - 1962 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):178-186.
Red and Green All Over Again: A Rejoinder to Arthur Pap.Hilary Putnam - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (January):100-103.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
30 ( #370,150 of 2,462,537 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,311 of 2,462,537 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes