Supererogation and altruism: a comment

Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):75-76 (2002)

Abstract
Supererogation can be distinguished from altruism, in that the former is located in the category of duty but exceeds the strict requirements of duty, whereas altruism belongs to a different moral category from duty. It follows that doctors do not act altruistically in their professional roles. Individual doctors may sometimes show supererogation, but supererogation is not a necessary feature of the medical profession. The aim of medicine is to act in the best interests of patients. This aim involves neither supererogation nor even the moral quality of beneficence. It is simply a job description. Morality enters medicine through the quality of the individual doctor's work, not by the definition of that work
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.28.2.75
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,504
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Professions as the Conscience of Society.P. Sieghart - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (3):117-122.
Do Doctors Owe a Special Duty of Beneficence to Their Patients?R. Gillon - 1986 - Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (4):171-173.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Hair Stylist, the Corn Merchant, and the Doctor: Ambiguously Altruistic.Lois Shepherd - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (4):509-517.
The Hair Stylist, the Corn Merchant, and the Doctor: Ambiguously Altruistic.Lois Shepherd - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (4):509-517.
Supererogation in Clinical Research.Deborah R. Barnbaum - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (3):343-349.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory.David Heyd - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Is It Bad to Omit an Act of Supererogation?Gregory Mellema - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:405-416.
Basics of Spiritual Altruism.Sangeetha Menon - 2007 - Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 39 (2):137-152.
Supererogation for Utilitarianism.Jean-Paul Vessel - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):299 - 319.
God’s Moral Goodness and Supererogation.Elizabeth Drummond Young - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):83-95.
Promising and Supererogation.Jason Kawall - 2005 - Philosophia 32 (1-4):389-398.
Supererogation.Douglas W. Portmore - forthcoming - In J. E. Crimmins & D. C. Long (eds.), Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism.
Self-Regarding Supererogatory Actions.Jason Kawall - 2003 - Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (3):487–498.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
20 ( #438,898 of 2,273,323 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #561,669 of 2,273,323 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature