History and Theory 51 (4):45-59 (2012)

Abstract
This article is divided into five parts. After a brief example in the first part, the second explains what historical sense-generation is about. The third characterizes tradition as a pregiven condition of all historical thinking. With respect to this condition, the constructivist theory of history is criticized as one-sided. The fourth part presents tradition as one of the four basic sense criteria of historical narration. The article concludes with a discussion of the role of tradition in the historical culture of modern societies.Historical sense-generation is a mental procedure by which the past is interpreted for the sake of understanding the present and anticipating the future. This mental procedure is an anthropological universal in the cultural orientation of human practical life and will lead to a concept of the course of time as a necessary factor in the cultural orientation of human life.Today the dominant opinion in metahistory conceives of historical sense-generation in a constructivist way. The sense of the past is understood as an ascription of meaning onto the past; the past itself has no impact on this meaning. But I hold that the past is already present in the circumstances and conditions under which historical thinking is performed and is obviously influenced by it. This presence can be called tradition. Before historians construct the past they themselves are already constructed by the present outcome of past developments in the world. Thus tradition is always at work in historical thinking before the past is thematized as history.Historical sense-generation needs basic principles of sense and meaning. Using these principles transforms the experience of the past into a meaningful history for the present. Despite cultural differences, four sense criteria can be identified as basic for making historical sense of the past. One of the four principles is tradition. It is the most fundamental one upon which all other modes of making sense of the past are grounded. It presents temporal change in the human world such that the world’s order is maintained despite all its changes. Since the emergence of the so-called advanced civilizations, other types of historical narration have overshadowed the constitutive role of tradition. Historical narration has been supplemented by exemplary, genetic, and critical approaches to the past. Yet the traditional one has remained the most frequently used and is the most basic and popular
Keywords typology of historical thinking  tradition  history  historical narration  historical consciousness  historical culture
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00646.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,617
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Educational Equality: A Politico‐Temporal Approach.Tomas Wedin - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 53 (2):248-272.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Memory and History.Dmitri Nikulin - 2008 - Idealistic Studies 38 (1-2):75-90.
Uniqueness and Historical Laws.Evan Fales - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):260-276.
Weakening and Strengthening History.David D. Roberts - 2010 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 2 (3):133-145.
Who's Afraid of Determinism? The Ambivalence of Macro-Historical Inquiry.Robert Adcock - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (3):346-364.
Mere History: The Place of Historical Studies in Theological Ethics.Jean Porter - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):103 - 126.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-30

Total views
31 ( #319,080 of 2,348,769 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,546 of 2,348,769 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes