On Two Responses to Moral Twin Earth

Theoria 80 (1):26-43 (2014)
Authors
Michael Rubin
University of Western Australia
Abstract
Terence Horgan and Mark Timmons's Moral Twin Earth thought experiment poses a serious challenge for an influential kind of moral realism. It presents us with a case in which it is intuitive that two speakers are expressing a substantive disagreement with one another. However, the meta-semantics associated with this relevant form of moral realism entails that the speakers' moral predicates express different semantic contents, and thus, the moral sentences they utter do not express conflicting propositions. Consequently, this variety of moral realism implies, wrongly, that the speakers do not express substantive disagreement after all. Some philosophers have objected to the Moral Twin Earth argument on the grounds that is possible for two speakers to express disagreement with one another, even if the moral sentences they utter do not express conflicting propositions. Heimer Geirsson supports this claim by appeal to the distinction between semantic reference and speaker reference. David Merli supports the same claim by noting that speakers whose moral sentences do not express conflicting propositions may nevertheless express a non-moral, practical disagreement over what to do. In this article, I argue that neither Geirsson nor Merli provides moral realists with a satisfying response to the Moral Twin Earth argument
Keywords Moral Twin Earth  moral realism  moral disagreement  ethical naturalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/theo.12010
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,686
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Realism: A Defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
The Language of Morals.R. M. Hare - 1952 - Oxford Clarendon Press.
Principia Ethica.G. E. Moore - 1903 - Dover Publications.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-01

Total downloads
104 ( #57,392 of 2,261,541 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #81,021 of 2,261,541 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature