The Information Society 32 (2):143-159 (2016)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In recent years, educational institutions have started using the tools of commercial data analytics in higher education. By gathering information about students as they navigate campus information systems, learning analytics “uses analytic techniques to help target instructional, curricular, and support resources” to examine student learning behaviors and change students’ learning environments. As a result, the information educators and educational institutions have at their disposal is no longer demarcated by course content and assessments, and old boundaries between information used for assessment and information about how students live and work are blurring. Our goal in this paper is to provide a systematic discussion of the ways in which privacy and learning analytics conflict and to provide a framework for understanding those conflicts.
We argue that there are five crucial issues about student privacy that we must address in order to ensure that whatever the laudable goals and gains of learning analytics, they are commensurate with respecting students’ privacy and associated rights, including (but not limited to) autonomy interests. First, we argue that we must distinguish among different entities with respect to whom students have, or lack, privacy. Second, we argue that we need clear criteria for what information may justifiably be collected in the name of learning analytics. Third, we need to address whether purported consequences of learning analytics (e.g., better learning outcomes) are justified and what the distributions of those consequences are. Fourth, we argue that regardless of how robust the benefits of learning analytics turn out to be, students have important autonomy interests in how information about them is collected. Finally, we argue that it is an open question whether the goods that justify higher education are advanced by learning analytics, or whether collection of information actually runs counter to those goods.
|
Keywords | privacy data analytics surveillance information ethics education privacy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The morality of freedom.J. Raz - 1988 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (1):108-109.
View all 22 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.Brent Mittelstadt, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter & Luciano Floridi - 2016 - Big Data and Society 3 (2).
“We Called That a Behavior”: The Making of Institutional Data.Madisson Whitman - 2020 - Big Data and Society 7 (1).
Modeling Ethics: Approaches to Data Creep in Higher Education.Madisson Whitman - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (6):1-18.
Similar books and articles
From Individual to Group Privacy in Big Data Analytics.Brent Mittelstadt - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (4):475-494.
Successful Failure: What Foucault Can Teach Us About Privacy Self-Management in a World of Facebook and Big Data.Gordon Hull - 2015 - Ethics and Information Technology 17 (2):89-101.
Epistemology, Pedagogy, Assessment and Learning Analytics.Simon Knight, Simon Buckingham Shum & Karen Littleton - 2013 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.
Epistemology, Assessment, Pedagogy: Where Learning Meets Analytics in the Middle Space.Simon Knight, Simon Buckingham Shum & Karen Littleton - forthcoming - Journal of Learning Analytics.
Government Surveillance and Why Defining Privacy Matters in a Post‐Snowden World.Kevin Macnish - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy (2).
Information Privacy and Social Self-Authorship.Daniel Susser - 2016 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 20 (3):216-239.
The Importance of Privacy Revisited.Norman Mooradian - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):163-174.
Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Data Science and Designing for Privacy.Michael Falgoust - 2016 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 20 (1):51-68.
Privacy as an Asset.Jarek Gryz - 2017 - In Marcellus Mindel, Kelly Lyons & Joe Wigglesworth (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th CASCON Conference. Markham, Canada: IBM/ACM. pp. 266-271.
Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Is There a Duty to Remain in Ignorance?Iain Brassington - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (2):101-115.
PETs and their users: a critical review of the potentials and limitations of the privacy as confidentiality paradigm. [REVIEW]Seda Gürses - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):539-563.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-09-16
Total views
1,266 ( #4,329 of 2,499,668 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
184 ( #3,070 of 2,499,668 )
2018-09-16
Total views
1,266 ( #4,329 of 2,499,668 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
184 ( #3,070 of 2,499,668 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads