The EU’s approach to prostitution: Explaining the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of the EP’s neo-abolitionist turn

European Journal of Women's Studies 28 (4):425-439 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this article is to offer a comprehensive analysis of the European Union’s neo-abolitionist approach to prostitution, drawing on the literature that addresses the global rise of neo-abolitionism and using key concepts developed by the gendered approaches to the European Union in order to adapt them to the particular context of the European Union. To do so, the article undertakes a critical frame analysis of the European Union’s violence against women policies, as it is in such policies that prostitution has been most thoroughly addressed, in combination with an analysis of the nature and evolution of the European Union’s gender equality policies more broadly. The article contends that the emergence of prostitution on the gender equality agenda of the European Union and the adoption of an explicit neo-abolitionist approach by the European Parliament can be explained by the coalescence, in the mid 1990s, of three key factors: Sweden’s accession to the European Union and the consequent positioning of Swedish femocrats, keen on exporting Sweden’s neo-abolitionist agenda to the European Union, in central positions of power within European Union institutions; the crystallisation of a robust neo-abolitionist velvet triangle through the creation of strong institutional links between the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Women’s Lobby, which remained unchallenged; and the gradual development of a hybrid model of gender equality in the European Union which resonates with neo-abolitionist ideals at the same time as neo-abolitionism itself was increasingly associated to gender equality as a fundamental European Union value.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Prostitution and Paternalism.Jeffrey A. Gauthier - 2014 - In David Boersema (ed.), Dimensions of Moral Agency. Cambridge Scholars. pp. 194-202.
Comment on 'Is prostitution harmful?'.Scott A. Anderson - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):82-83.
Liberalism and Prostitution.Peter de Marneffe - 2009 - New York, US: Oup Usa.
How to Argue About Prostitution.Michelle Madden Dempsey - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):65-80.
Re-thinking Prostitution: Feminism, Sex, and the Self.Belinda J. Carpenter - 2000 - Peter Lang Incorporated, International Academic Publishers.
What's Wrong with Prostitution?Igor Primoratz - 1993 - Philosophy 68 (264):159 - 182.
Prostitution and the ideal state: a defense of a policy of vigilance.Agustin Vicente - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):475-487.
Prostitution.Michelle Madden Dempsey - 2019 - In Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. Springer Verlag. pp. 599-622.
Prostitution & Instrumentalization.Rob Lovering - 2017 - Philosophy Now (123):14-17.
Prostitution and the Good of Sex.Sascha Settegast - 2018 - Social Theory and Practice 44 (3):377-403.
Philosophical assumptions and presumptions about trafficking for prostitution.Donna Dickenson - 2006 - In Christien van den Anker & Jeroen Doomernik (eds.), Trafficking and women's rights. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 43-54.
Is prostitution harmful?Ole Martin Moen - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):73-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-29

Downloads
23 (#666,649)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?