W.B. Gallie and Essentially Contested Concepts

Philosophical Papers 39 (2):257-270 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In virtue of what are later and an earlier group members of one and the numerically same tradition? Gallie was one of the few philosophers to have engaged with issues surrounding this question. My article is not a faithful exegesis of Gallie but develops a terminology in which to discuss issues surrounding the numerical identity of a tradition over time, based on some of his insights.

Similar books and articles

Reply to David Harrah's Discussion Note.W. B. Gallie - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):239-240.
W. B. Gallie's “Essentially Contested Concepts”.Henry W. Johnstone - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):2-2.
Art as an Essentially Contested Concept.W. B. Gallie - 1956 - Philosophical Quarterly 6 (23):97-114.
On Explaining Political Disagreement: The Notion of an Essentially Contested Concept.Andrew Mason - 1990 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 33 (1):81 – 98.
Gallie and the Scientific Tradition.David Harrah - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):234-239.
Law is Not (Best Considered) an Essentially Contested Concept.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - International Journal of Law in Context 7:209-232.
Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused? [REVIEW]Samantha Miles - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (3):285-298.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-11

Downloads
994 (#7,005)

6 months
99 (#6,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David-Hillel Ruben
Birkbeck, University of London

Citations of this work

Essential Contestability and Evaluation.Pekka Väyrynen - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):471-488.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references