Informal Logic 13 (2) (1991)
Abstract |
What rational foundation underlies argument-critical judgements? What are the canons of argument criticism and how are they to be "justified"? This paper explores an analogy between art- and argument-criticism and argues that the analogy promises not only to illuminate the nature of argument criticism and capture the central goals of instruction in informal logic, but also to resolve fundamental problems at the foundations of normative theory of argument concerning the "justification" of standards of reasoning
|
Keywords | convergent arguments, linked arguments |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
How to Improve the Convergent Argument Calculation.Alexander V. Tyaglo - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (1).
Argument and Its Uses (OSSA 2005 Keynote Address).J. Anthony Blair - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (2):137-151.
Against the "Ordinary Summing" Test for Convergence.G. C. Goddu - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (3):215-236.
On the Distinction Between Convergent and Linked Arguments.David A. Conway - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (3).
Argument Schemes in Computer System Safety Engineering.Tangming Yuan & Tim Kelly - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (2):89-109.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-24
Total views
9 ( #891,965 of 2,410,273 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,207 of 2,410,273 )
2013-11-24
Total views
9 ( #891,965 of 2,410,273 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,207 of 2,410,273 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads