On pandemics and the duty to care: whose duty? who cares? [Book Review]

BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-6 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Background As a number of commentators have noted, SARS exposed the vulnerabilities of our health care systems and governance structures. Health care professionals (HCPs) and hospital systems that bore the brunt of the SARS outbreak continue to struggle with the aftermath of the crisis. Indeed, HCPs – both in clinical care and in public health – were severely tested by SARS. Unprecedented demands were placed on their skills and expertise, and their personal commitment to their profession was severely tried. Many were exposed to serious risk of morbidity and mortality, as evidenced by the World Health Organization figures showing that approximately 30% of reported cases were among HCPs, some of whom died from the infection. Despite this challenge, professional codes of ethics are silent on the issue of duty to care during communicable disease outbreaks, thus providing no guidance on what is expected of HCPs or how they ought to approach their duty to care in the face of risk. Discussion In the aftermath of SARS and with the spectre of a pandemic avian influenza, it is imperative that we (re)consider the obligations of HCPs for patients with severe infectious diseases, particularly diseases that pose risks to those providing care. It is of pressing importance that organizations representing HCPs give clear indication of what standard of care is expected of their members in the event of a pandemic. In this paper, we address the issue of special obligations of HCPs during an infectious disease outbreak. We argue that there is a pressing need to clarify the rights and responsibilities of HCPs in the current context of pandemic flu preparedness, and that these rights and responsibilities ought to be codified in professional codes of ethics. Finally, we present a brief historical accounting of the treatment of the duty to care in professional health care codes of ethics. Summary An honest and critical examination of the role of HCPs during communicable disease outbreaks is needed in order to provide guidelines regarding professional rights and responsibilities, as well as ethical duties and obligations. With this paper, we hope to open the social dialogue and advance the public debate on this increasingly urgent issue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,378

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is care a virtue for health care professionals?Howard J. Curzer - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):51-69.
Patients' duties.Michael J. Meyer - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):541-555.
Ethics and public health emergencies: Encouraging responsibility.Matthew K. Wynia - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (4):1 – 4.
Between Beneficence and Justice: The Ethics of Stewardship in Medicine.L. A. Jansen - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):50-63.
Rights, Duties and Responsibilities in Health Care.H. E. Emson - 1992 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (1):3-11.
Health risks and the health care professional.Helen L. Treanor - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):251-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-17

Downloads
57 (#248,055)

6 months
7 (#171,424)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Bernstein
Purdue University

References found in this work

In harm's way: AMA physicians and the duty to treat.Chalmers C. Clark - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):65 – 87.
Physician Obligation in Disaster Preparedness and Response.Karine Morin, Daniel Higginson & Michael Goldrich - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (4):417-421.

Add more references