Philebus 11b: Good or the Good

Apeiron 53 (2):161-185 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The sentence setting the stage for the philosophical investigation within the Philebus is, naively translated, “He says that to enjoy is good.” Instead of the predicate adjective “good,” most interpreters prefer to translate with a definite description, “the good,” with consequences that affect the interpretation of the dialogue as a whole. Part one defends the naïve translation, both in the context of Socrates’ first seven speeches and viewing the dialogue as a whole. Part two considers and rejects the reasons given against the naïve translation on the basis of grammar, idiosyncratic Platonic style, immediate context, and later restatements.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Absolute Good and the Human Goods.R. Ferber - 2003 - Philosophical Inquiry 25 (3-4):117-126.
An Inconsistency in the Philebus?Joachim Aufderheide - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (5):817 - 837.
The Emerging Good in Plato's Philebus.John V. Garner - 2017 - Evanston, IL, USA: Northwestern University Press.
Pleasure, Falsity, and the Good in Plato's "Philebus".Ciriaco Medina Sayson - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Bien en soi ou bien humain?Enrico Berti - 2017 - Chôra 15:257-272.
The Philebus and the Good: the Unity of the Dialogue in which the Good is Unity.Kenneth M. Sayre - 1987 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 2:45-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-19

Downloads
36 (#434,037)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Hilding Rudebusch
Northern Arizona University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mathematical logic.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1951 - Cambridge,: Harvard University Press.
Mathematical Logic.W. V. Quine - 1940 - Philosophy of Science 8 (1):136-136.
Socrates.George Rudebusch - 2009 - Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Descriptions.Peter Ludlow - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Socrates.George Rudebusch - 2021 - The Philosophers' Magazine 92:79-84.

View all 14 references / Add more references