Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida both came to Hamlet comparatively late in their careers, and in both cases, their writings on Hamlet are somewhat peripheral to their philosophical projects. However, reframing their readings of this play through their writings on Austin’s concept of performativity can, as this paper will show, lead to a surprising reappraisal of their views on Shakespeare’s masterpiece, which in turn frames the concept of performativity in a new light. Austin was notoriously dismissive of performatives spoken on stage; Derrida’s Signature Event Context challenges him on this view; Cavell’s “What Did Derrida Want of Austin?” aims to show how Derrida’s critique misses its mark. Curiously, however, when writing on Hamlet, it is Cavell – perhaps the foremost of Austin’s inheritors – who takes up Hamlet as a means of taking Austin’s formulation to task, while Derrida – perhaps the foremost of Austin’s critics – takes up Hamlet as an opportunity subtly to revisit his earlier critique in ways far more receptive to the idea of performativity. For example, Derrida’s readings of Hamlet explicitly call attention to scenes involving classic performatives such as the swearing of oaths, or bearing witness. Yet, as the quotation in my title indicates, Hamlet has its own ideas of how performativity works. Cavell’s precept that Shakespeare’s plays offer investigations of their own theatricality gives us to see that Hamlet takes up the very issues that troubled Austin, including speaking performatives on stage, and swearing to things with the tongue but not the mind. Cavell and Derrida’s readings of Hamlet, then, show us that the play is an invitation to revisit the concept of performativity, yet the play itself does so in ways perhaps more destabilising to the idea of performativity than Cavell and Derrida might have realised.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,878
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Morality of Speech: Cavell’s Critique of Derrida. [REVIEW]Espen Dahl - 2011 - Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):81-101.
For Derrida.J. Hillis Miller - 2009 - Fordham University Press.
Stanley Cavell's Shakespeare.Gerald L. Bruns - 1990 - Critical Inquiry 16 (3):612-632.
Stanley Cavell and Literary Skepticism.Michael Fischer - 1989 - University of Chicago Press.
‘The Ordinary’ in Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida.Judith Wolfe - 2013 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 17 (1).
The Concept of Fate in Hamlet.Feng Luo - 2010 - Modern Philosophy 4:101-107.
Lyotard’s Performance.Robin Usher - 2006 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 25 (4):279-288.


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #464,333 of 2,438,949 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,623 of 2,438,949 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes