Journal of the History of Biology 51 (3):479-533 (2018)
AbstractAn earlier article described the mid-twentieth century origins of the method of “paradigms” in paleobiology, as a way of making testable hypotheses about the functional morphology of extinct organisms. The present article describes the use of “paradigms” through the 1970s and, briefly, to the end of the century. After I had proposed the paradigm method to help interpret the ecological history of brachiopods, my students developed it in relation to that and other invertebrate phyla, notably in Euan Clarkson’s analysis of vision in trilobites. David Raup’s computer-aided “theoretical morphology” was then combined with my functional or adaptive emphasis, in Adolf Seilacher’s tripartite “constructional morphology.” Stephen Jay Gould, who had strongly endorsed the method, later switched to criticizing the “adaptationist program” he claimed it embodied. Although the explicit use of paradigms in paleobiology had declined by the end of the century, the method was tacitly subsumed into functional morphology as “biomechanics.”
Similar books and articles
Performative contradiction and the regrounding for philosophical paradigms.Donghui Han - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):607-621.
Wittgenstein the Morphologist I.Kristijan Krkač & Josip Lukin - 2008 - Synthesis Philosophica 23 (2):427-438.
Stephen Jay Gould, Jack Sepkoski, and the ‘Quantitative Revolution’ in American Paleobiology.David Sepkoski - 2005 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):209-237.
Paradigms, Traditions, and History: The Influence of Philosophy of Science on MacIntyre’s Ethical Thought.John C. Caiazza - 2014 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):685-704.
Performative Contradiction and the Regrounding for Philosophical Paradigms.Han Donghui & Wang Xuan - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):607 - 621.
Constructional morphology: The analysis of constraints in evolution dedicated to A. seilacher in honour of his 60. birthday.Wolf-Ernst Reify, Roger D. K. Thomas & Martin S. Fischer - 1985 - Acta Biotheoretica 34 (2-4):233-248.
A synthesis of the prevailing conflict management paradigms: Toward a Unity of Conflict.James D. Smith - 2013 - Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University
Implementing Generalized Empirical Method in Neuroscience by Functionally Ordering Tasks.Robert Henman - 2016 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 9 (1):10-21.
Unlearning as a function of degree of interpolated learning and method of testing in the a-b, a-c and a-b, c-d paradigms.Bertram E. Garskof - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (4p1):579.
An annotated bibliography of C.j. Van der klaauw with notes on the impact of his work.Jacob L. Dubbeldam - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1):1-22.
Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Case Study of Clinical Decision-Making in Medical Genetics.Andrea Edith Glassberg - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Washington
Mind the gap: Misdirection, inattentional blindness and the relationship between overt and covert attention.Aidan Moran & Nuala Brady - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1105-1106.
On the Chinese Origin of the Galley Method of Arithmetical Division.Lam Lay-Yong - 1966 - British Journal for the History of Science 3 (1):66-69.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Challenging the Adaptationist Paradigm: Morphogenesis, Constraints, and Constructions.Marco Tamborini - 2020 - Journal of the History of Biology 53 (2):269-294.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology.E. S. Russell - 1916 - Journal of the History of Biology 17 (1):151-151.
The inference of function from structure in fossils.M. J. S. Rudwick - 1964 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (57):27-40.
Before hierarchy: the rise and fall of Stephen Jay Gould’s first macroevolutionary synthesis.Max W. Dresow - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (2).