Health Care Analysis 10 (4):391-402 (2002)

Abstract
Dialogical ethics are a procedural alternative to substantive ethics such as consequentialism, deontology, principlism, casuistry, virtue ethics and care ethics. Dialogical ethics are procedural in that they do not establish goods in advance, unlike substantive ethics, but rather determine goods through a procedure enacted by the actual parties involved (although some substantive notion of justice may still be required); and they are dialogical in that the procedure is that of dialogue, involving both empathic critical discussion and negotiation. A fundamental tenet of dialogical ethics may be the use of appropriate rules of order regulating dialogue among the parties involved. Some of the central characteristics of such rules of order are that they are reciprocally regulated by dialogue, that they override other ethical considerations, and that they institute empathic critical discussion and negotiation within the ethical dialogue. Dialogical bioethics are the application of dialogical ethics to ethical problems in medicine. The approach of dialogical bioethics has proven fruitful for resolving bioethical problems such as that of medical futility, where approaches of substantive ethics have reached an impasse. There is room for further study of special challenges within dialogical bioethics, such as the incompetence of some involved parties, conflicts of interests of third parties, and the cost-effectiveness of this ethical approach
Keywords dialogical (bio)ethics  procedural ethics  rules of order  substantive ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1023431310918
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Understanding Respect: Learning From Patients.N. W. Dickert & N. E. Kass - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):419-423.
Processes and Pitfalls of Dialogical Bioethics.Abraham Rudnick - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (2):123-135.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
41 ( #231,253 of 2,333,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #584,690 of 2,333,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes