Authors
Laura Ruetsche
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
It has been suggested that the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) is "incomplete" if it lacks a dynamics for possessed values. I argue that this is only one of two possible attitudes one might adopt toward a Modal Interpretation without dynamics. According to the other attitude, such an interpretation is a complete interpretation of QM as standardly formulated, an interpretation whose innovation is to attempt to make sense of the quantum realm without the expedient of novel physics. Then I explain why this attitude, though available, is unattractive. Without dynamics, the Modal Interpretation vanquishes the measurement problem only, it seems, to succumb to the problem of state preparation. On this view, the Modal Interpretation needs dynamics not to be an interpretation at all, but to be an adequate one. I review reasons to suspect that the dynamics which would best suit the Modal Interpretation--a dynamics equivalent to a set of two time transition probabilities of the sort used to solve the preparation problem--is not a dynamics the interpretation can have. I close with a brief discussion of versions of the Modal Interpretation that may not succumb to the considerations presented here.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698590305235
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,060
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Weyling the Time Away: The Non-Unitary Implementability of Quantum Field Dynamics on Curved Spacetime.Aristidis Arageorgis, John Earman & Laura Ruetsche - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (2):151-184.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Olimpia Lombardi & Dennis Dieks - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.
Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Michael Dickson - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wavefunction Tails in the Modal Interpretation.Michael Dickson - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:366 - 376.
Possible Worlds in the Modal Interpretation.Meir Hemmo - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):337.
Two No-Go Theorems for Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.E. P. - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30 (3):403-431.
A Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Olimpia Lombardi & Mario Castagnino - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2):380-443.
Van Fraassen on Preparation and Measurement.Laura Ruetsche - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):346.
How to Interpret Quantum Mechanics.Jeffrey Bub - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (2):253 - 273.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
65 ( #151,942 of 2,403,706 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #360,211 of 2,403,706 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes