Brill | Rodopi (2007)
AbstractMuch has happened in the field of contemporary epistemology since Quine’s “Epistemology Naturalized” was published in 1969. Even before Ronald Giere published his article “Philosophy of Science Naturalized,” naturalized philosophy of science had been influenced by the so-called historical approach. Kuhm, Lakatos, Feyerabend and Laudan all contributed importantly to this trend. In this light it has emerged, without a doubt, that philosophy of science is closely related to epistemology. This volume explores some of the relevant relations and will be of interest to epistemologists and philosophers of science.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Carnap Versus Quine, or Aprioristic Versus Naturalized Epistemology, or a Lesson From Dispositions.Wolfgang Spohn - unknown
Empirical Psychology, Naturalized Epistemology, and First Philosophy.Harvey Siegel - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (4):667-676.
Having It All: Naturalized Normativity in Feminist Science Studies.Sharyn Clough - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (1):102-118.
Naturalized Philosophy of Science with a Plurality of Methods.David Stump - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):456-460.
Normative Epistemology and Naturalized Epistemology.Harold I. Brown - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):53 – 78.
Information-Based Epistemology, Ecological Epistemology and Epistemology Naturalized.Richard E. Grandy - 1987 - Synthese 70 (February):191-203.
Epistemology Naturalized and "Epistemology Naturalized".Richard E. Grandy - 1994 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):341-349.
Quine’s Naturalized Epistemology and the Third Dogma of Empiricism.Robert Sinclair - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):455-472.