Structuring legal institutions

Law and Philosophy 17 (3):215 - 232 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article is concerned with the question of how legal institutions are structured with the use of constitutive, institutive, consequential, and terminative rules. To that end, the regulation of international treaties as laid down in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969 is analysed. This leads to the discovery of two additional categories of rules: content rules and invalidating rules. Finally, the special status of unique legal institutions is investigated. Unique legal institutions – for example, heads of state, parliaments, and supreme courts – enjoy validity in a legal system to the exclusion of the validity of any other legal institution of the same category in that system.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#457,286)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

In defence of constitutive rules.Corrado Roversi - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):14349-14370.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Searle - 1969 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 4 (1):59-61.
Fenomeni di fenomeni.Amedeo G. Conte - 1986 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 63 (1):29-57.
Legal Validity Qua Specific Mode of Existence.Dick W. P. Ruiter - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (5):479-505.

Add more references