Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):282 – 294 (1968)
Three polemical exchanges between Bertrand Russell and F. H. Bradley, F. C. S. Schiller, and the prosecutor in Russell's trial for violating the Defence of the Realm Act in 1916 are examined in order to bring to light some paradigms of informal reasoning, with a view to encouraging research into the logic of natural language. Ten such paradigms are expressed, e.g., Agree with the contention but not for the reasons given; Agree that the criticism is valid and report that one has modified the criticized doctrine but not in the manner suggested
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Russell, Crexells, and d'Ors: Barcelona, 1920.Jaime Nubiola - 1994 - Russell: The Journal of the Betrand Russell Archives 14 (2):155-161.
Russell's Modal Logic? Review of Jan Dejnožka, Bertrand Russell on Modality and Logical Relevance.Gary Ostertag - 2000 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 20 (2):165-72.
Bertrand Russell, the Social Scientist.Bertrand Russell (ed.) - 1973 - Bertrand Russell Supranational Society.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads4 ( #648,442 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?