Three polemical exchanges between Bertrand Russell and F. H. Bradley, F. C. S. Schiller, and the prosecutor in Russell's trial for violating the Defence of the Realm Act in 1916 are examined in order to bring to light some paradigms of informal reasoning, with a view to encouraging research into the logic of natural language. Ten such paradigms are expressed, e.g., Agree with the contention but not for the reasons given; Agree that the criticism is valid and report that one has modified the criticized doctrine but not in the manner suggested
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201746808601530
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,321
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Analysis of Mind.Bertrand Russell - 1921 - Duke University Press.
Bertrand Russell and Trinity.G. H. Hardy - 1942 - London: Cambridge University Press.
Mr. Russell's Psychology.F. C. S. Schiller - 1922 - Journal of Philosophy 19 (11):281-292.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
10 ( #848,678 of 2,419,792 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,712 of 2,419,792 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes