Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (6):669-698 (2016)

Authors
Tina Rulli
University of California, Davis
Abstract
_ Source: _Page Count 30 Millions of children worldwide could benefit from adoption. One could argue that prospective parents have a pro tanto duty to adopt rather than create children. For the sake of argument, I assume there is such a duty and focus on a pressing objection to it. Prospective parents may prefer that their children are genetically related to them. I examine eight reasons prospective parents have for preferring genetic children: for parent-child physical resemblance, for family resemblance, for psychological similarity, for the sake of love, to achieve a kind of immortality, for the genetic connection itself, to be a procreator, and to experience pregnancy. I argue that, with the possible exception of the pregnancy desire, these reasons fail to defeat a duty to adopt a child rather than create one, even assuming that we do have some leeway to favor our own interests.
Keywords procreative ethics   parenthood   biological   adoption   rescue   genetic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
DOI 10.1163/17455243-4681062
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ethical Problems with Ethnic Matching in Gamete Donation.Hane Htut Maung - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (2):112-116.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Preferring a Genetically-Related Child.Tina Rulli - 2016 - New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy 13:669-698.
The Unique Value of Adoption.Tina Rulli - 2014 - In Francoise Baylis & Carolyn McLeod (eds.), Family-Making: Contemporary Ethical Challenges. Oxford University Press.
Human Reproductive Cloning and Reasons for Deprivation.D. A. Jensen - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):619-623.
Procreative Beneficence and the Prospective Parent.P. Herissone-Kelly - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):166-169.
Parental Genetic Shaping and Parental Environmental Shaping.Anca Gheaus - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (267):20-31.
Procreative Beneficence – Cui Bono?Jakob Elster - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (9):482-488.
Reproductive Cloning Combined with Genetic Modification.C. Strong - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):654-658.
New Developments in Family Ethics: An Introduction.Monika Betzler & Jörg Löschke - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (6):641-651.
The Ethics of Procreation and Adoption.Tina Rulli - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (6):305-315.
Reproductive Reasons and Procreative Duty.James McBain - 2013 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):67-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-03-31

Total views
4,938 ( #266 of 2,326,555 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
488 ( #568 of 2,326,555 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes