Mind 117 (468):1059-1063 (2008)

Authors
Ian Rumfitt
Oxford University
Abstract
I explain why Fernando Ferreira's interesting formal result does not threaten the bilateralist account of the sense of the connectives.
Keywords Bilateral formalizations of logic  Classical logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzn032
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logical Basis of Metaphysics.Michael DUMMETT - 1991 - Harvard University Press.
The Logical Basis of Metaphysics.Michael Dummett, Hilary Putnam & James Conant - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (177):519-527.
The Revival of Rejective Negation.Lloyd Humberstone - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (4):331-381.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Some Comments on Ian Rumfitt’s Bilateralism.Nils Kürbis - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (6):623-644.
Bilateralism in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Nissim Francez - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (2-3):1-21.
Bilateralism in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Nissim Francez - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):239-259.
An Expressivist Bilateral Meaning-is-Use Analysis of Classical Propositional Logic.John Cantwell - 2015 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 24 (1):27-51.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
95 ( #95,940 of 2,326,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #27,252 of 2,326,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes