International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (5):657-680 (2009)
The debate about global distributive justice is characterized by an often stark opposition between universalistic approaches, advocating an egalitarian global redistribution of wealth (Beitz, Pogge, Barry, Tan), and particularistic positions, aiming to justify a restriction of redistribution to the domestic community (D. Miller, R. Miller, Blake, Nagel, Rawls). I argue that an approach starting from the deliberative model of democracy (Habermas) can overcome this opposition. On the one hand, the increasingly global scope of economic interactions implies that the range of individuals concerned with the redistribution of wealth should also be increasingly universal. On the other hand, the need for democratic deliberation refers to the fact that demands of justice should be contextual and should take into account the particular circumstances, needs and values of the people concerned. Both concerns can be realized simultaneously only within a multi-layered democratic system in which redistribution is a concern at the domestic, the international and the global level.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.David M. Rasmussen, Jurgen Habermas, Christian Lenhardt & Shierry Weber Nicholsen - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.
Citations of this work BETA
Democratic Agents of Justice.John S. Dryzek - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (4):361-384.
Similar books and articles
Comentarios Sobre la Concepcion de la Justicia Global de Pogge.Pablo Gilabert - 2007 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 33 (2):205-222.
Can Global Justice Provide a Path Toward Achieving Justice Across the Americas?Allison B. Wolf - 2005 - Journal of Global Ethics 1 (2):153 – 176.
The Implication of Rawls' Approach to Public Reason.Xin Liu - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (1):161-169.
Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope of Distributive Justice.Arash Abizadeh - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (4):318–358.
Deliberation and Global Criminal Justice: Juries in the International Criminal Court.John Gastil, Colin J. Lingle & Eugene P. Deess - 2010 - Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):69-90.
Political Equality and Global Poverty: An Alternative Egalitarian Approach to Distributive Justice.Sagar Sanyal - 2009 - Dissertation, University of Canterbury
Principles or Imagination? Two Approaches to Global Justice.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):203 – 221.
Added to index2010-07-27
Total downloads48 ( #109,221 of 2,172,801 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,033 of 2,172,801 )
How can I increase my downloads?